Years in the making, Sovereign Limits is a database of international boundaries intended for use in the research, visualization, and mapping of the borders that divide up sovereignty on land and sea.

more posts >> Latest entry:

Nicaragua v. Colombia (ICJ 2016)

June 29, 2018
Scott Edmonds

Ever since Nicaragua brought a case against Colombia to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2016, entitled: “Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Nicaragua and Colombia beyond 200 M from the Nicaragua Coast,” the Court has been faced with the question of whether or not there is a hierarchy to continental shelf claims. In other words, would a coastal State’s 200 nautical mile (M) exclusive economic zone (EEZ) entitlement to the continental shelf and superjacent waters under Part V of UNCLOS prevail over an opposing coastal State’s claim to an extended continental shelf under Part VI? The former being based on a legal entitlement of all coastal States and the latter based on a geomorphologic claim by a coastal State that its shelf satisfies the stipulations set out in Part VI of UNCLOS beyond 200 M, which must be subsequently reviewed and approved by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS).

In its 2012 Judgment on the maritime boundary between these two States, the ICJ loosely defined the 200 M seaward limit of Nicaragua’s EEZ entitlement as the “approximate eastern limit of the relevant area,” but stated that Nicaragua had “not established that it has a continental margin that extends far enough to overlap with Colombia’s 200-nautical-mile entitlement to the continental shelf, measured from Colombia’s mainland coast. . . .” This new case is Nicaragua’s attempt to recast its scientific findings in hopes of convincing the Court that it has an entitlement to the continental shelf beyond 200 M from its baselines.

Map from 2012 ICJ Judgment Colombia v. Nicaragua

Assuming for a moment that Nicaragua’s claim to an extended continental shelf in the western Caribbean Sea were to be upheld, and if this area were found to overlap Colombia’s 200 M EEZ entitlement, the question then remains as to whether or not this overlapping area of continental shelf entitlements (seabed and subsoil only) would require delimitation. Or, on the other hand, whether Colombia’s 200 M entitlements would automatically prevail due to the legal nature of the EEZ entitlement.

State practice seems to favor the position that extended continental shelf claims are reserved for areas of seabed that fall beyond 200 M from any coastal State’s baselines. In the general vicinity of the western Caribbean Sea, Mexico, Cuba, and the United States have all made extended continental shelf claims in the Gulf of Mexico. However, those claims have all been limited to the areas known as the “Eastern Gap” and the “Western Gap.” None of the extended continental shelf claims have ventured into the 200 M EEZ of neighboring States.

Map from The Heritage Foundation

In the North Atlantic, the enclaved French islands of St. Pierre and Miquelon illustrate very clearly this respect of the 200 M EEZ entitlement. In its consideration of an extended continental shelf claim for these dependent islands, France has recognized that the extended continental shelf in the area south of St. Pierre and Miquelon’s maritime corridor starts beyond Canada’s 200 M EEZ entitlement limit. Their hopes of acquiring a portion of this potentially oil-rich outer continental shelf area would have them making a discontinuous “leap frog” claim over Canada’s 200 M EEZ entitlement, and thus landing in the outer continental shelf beyond any Canadian legal entitlement.

Map from

It is important to note that the ICJ’s ruling in this case will only impact sovereign rights to the seabed and subsoil, since Nicaragua would have no EEZ entitlement beyond 200 M from its baselines. Therefore, the more seaward location of the San Andres archipelago, which the Court has already ruled are part of Colombia’s sovereign territory, would give Colombia the sovereign rights to the resources found in the shelf’s superjacent waters regardless of which State might be granted the sovereign rights to the continental shelf below.

5300 Dorsey Hall Drive
Suite 201
Ellicott City, MD 21042

(800) 761-6944
Click here to order the Maritime Boundaries of the World poster

No other mapping company in the world—public or private—has more consulting experience with boundary litigation than International Mapping. Members of our staff have been serving as international boundary consultants since 1979. Whether you’re looking to communicate a boundary position, evaluate an opposing claim, or better understand your maritime entitlements under United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS-III), we can help. Recent cases include (represented client underlined):
  • Côte d’Ivoire/Ghana Maritime Boundary Dispute (ITLOS)
  • Philippines/China South China Sea Arbitration (PCA)
  • Peru/Chile Maritime Boundary Dispute (ICJ)
  • Bangladesh/India Maritime Boundary Dispute (PCA)
Since 2000, International Mapping has been serving the mapping needs of a diverse clientele. Over the years we have delivered every type of custom map imaginable. Behind each and every project is a talented team of award-winning cartographers who know how to incorporate subtle design features to accentuate the look and feel of a map. We pride ourselves in creating maps that are some of the best in the industry.

Equator Maps is the publishing division of International Mapping. To purchase poster maps, visit
While the experience we have in traditional media is unparalleled, we are constantly adapting to the demands of our clients and evolving technologies. Services we offer include (but are not limited to):
  • Map, atlas and guidebook design and production
  • Textbook and educational maps and graphics
  • 2D and 3D map and geographic illustration creation
  • Interactive Maps
  • Complete GIS capabilities
  • Map exhibit and display design
  • 3D physical terrain model development
  • Statistical mapping and analysis
We are a full-service cartographic firm that strives to communicate what’s important. To do that, we work closely with our clients to better understand what matters most to them. It’s a collaborative effort that combines the latest technological innovations in digital cartography with age-old mapmaking craftsmanship.